TULSA, Okla. United States Attorney Clint Johnson today announced the results of the November 2022 Federal Grand Jury A. Those lawsuits aimed, in part, to recover health care costs for smoking-related illnesses. The Biden administration has been the first to embrace grassroots programs and has called for sustainable funding for "harm reduction services" in its national overdose prevention strategy. The Drug Enforcement Administration and Tulsa Police Department are the investigative agencies. Federal Grand Jury Indictments AnnouncedDecember 2022, Former Chief Financial Officer Faces Charges for Failing to Pay More Than $3.6 Million in Employee Tax Withholdings and for Pocketing $130,000 from His Employers Bank Account, Former Prisoner Transport Officer Pleads Guilty to Sexually Assaulting and Kidnapping Male Detainee, Former Police Officer Admits to Lying to Investigators About Stealing $345 While On-Duty, FBI Oklahoma City 2022 Operational Successes, McCurtain County Resident Pleads Guilty to Child Abuse in Indian Country, Former Oklahoma Supervisory Correctional Officer Sentenced for Promoting White Supremacist Assault on Black Inmates and Ordering Other Abuse, Man Sentenced for Delaware County Murder and Assault, Federal Grand Jury B Indictments Announced-November 2022, Missouri Man Pleads Guilty to Using Violence Against Witnesses with Knowledge of the Disappearance, Murder of a Joplin Woman, Man Convicted for Striking and Killing a Victim with a Water Meter Key, Locust Grove Man Sentenced to 120 Months in Prison After Robbing Woman at Gunpoint in Her Home, Woman Who Drove with Methamphetamine in Her System Sentenced for Taking Another Womans Life in a Collision, Federal Jury Convicts Tulsa Man of Domestic Violence Strangulation, Firearms Charges, Missouri Woman Pleads Guilty to Kidnapping Resulting in Death, Bristow Man Convicted of 2018 Murder in Jenks, Bixby Man Sentenced to Serve Five Years in Federal Prison for Conspiracy to Steal Trade Secrets from Oklahoma City Oil and Gas Company, Former Correctional Officer Pleads Guilty to Accepting Bribes to Smuggle Contraband Into Federal Prison, Federal Grand Jury A Indictments AnnouncedNovember 2022, Former Firefighter Sentenced for Two Bank Robberies, 1 - 20 of 1194 Results USA v. Adams (okwd-5:2022-cr-00411-119481), USA v. Aguilar-Morales (okwd-5:2022-cr-00163-117614), USA v. Aldama-Martinez et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00133-117588), USA v. Aldama-Martinez et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00133-117590), USA v. Ali et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00119-117383), USA v. Ali et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00119-117384), USA v. Allen (okwd-5:2022-cr-00084-117056), USA v. Alvarado-Romero (okwd-5:2022-cr-00182-117703), USA v. Andrews, Jr (okwd-5:2022-cr-00431-119667), USA v. Arroyo et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00239-118349), USA v. Arterberry (okwd-5:2022-cr-00338-119002), USA v. Arterberry (okwd-5:2022-cr-00338-119003), USA v. Ashley (okwd-5:2022-cr-00494-120095), USA v. Ballard (okwd-5:2022-cr-00184-117734), USA v. Barkus (okwd-5:2022-cr-00271-118515), USA v. Barkus (okwd-5:2022-cr-00271-118514), USA v. Bass (okwd-5:2022-cr-00111-117421), USA v. Batista et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00374-119331), USA v. Batista et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00374-119332), USA v. Been (okwd-5:2022-cr-00268-118500), USA v. Bellamy, Jr (okwd-5:2022-cr-00350-119021), USA v. Benson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00143-117543), USA v. Berry (okwd-5:2022-cr-00248-118365), USA v. Black (okwd-5:2022-cr-00287-118688), USA v. Boone (okwd-5:2022-cr-00276-118523), USA v. Booth (okwd-5:2022-cr-00124-117357), USA v. Bowman (okwd-5:2022-cr-00349-119036), USA v. Britton (okwd-5:2022-cr-00343-119014), USA v. Buford (okwd-5:2022-cr-00473-119943), USA v. Buford (okwd-5:2022-cr-00265-118496), USA v. Bunch et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00183-117709), USA v. Butler (okwd-5:2022-cr-00204-117965), USA v. Butler (okwd-5:2022-cr-00169-117718), USA v. Butterfield (okwd-5:2022-cr-00407-119461), USA v. Cade (okwd-5:2022-cr-00202-117950), USA v. Ceballos-Grado (okwd-5:2022-cr-00372-119297), USA v. Chen (okwd-5:2022-cr-00305-118802), USA v. Chill (okwd-5:2022-cr-00160-117537), USA v. Colbert (okwd-5:2022-cr-00201-117935), USA v. Colbert (okwd-5:2022-cr-00201-117936), USA v. Collins (okwd-5:2022-cr-00386-119321), USA v. Collins (okwd-5:2022-cr-00386-119322), USA v. Crary (okwd-5:2022-cr-00158-117558), USA v. Crary (okwd-5:2022-cr-00158-117559), USA v. Daniel (okwd-5:2022-cr-00229-118163), USA v. Dominguez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00342-119010), USA v. Douangpanya et al. This week, the Court made it clear that Perrys predatory crimes and blame shifting warranted a lifetime in federal prison., In his sentencing guidelines, the judge recommended that Perry be remanded to a medium security prison or a facility that will allow him the opportunity in the most comprehensive mental health and gender-care treatment programs., A press release issued in May 2022 by the Department of Justice when Perry was convicted of the charges against him refers to him as a man and makes no mention of his transexual identity. They are further charged with aiding and abetting each other to possess with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of methamphetamine and to possess with intent to distribute 40 grams or more of fentanyl. Federal authorities haven't acted to shut down any sites so far but haven't publicly supported them either. Black is further charged with discharging the firearm during a crime of violence. But as of mid-March, neither state had received federal requests for their share. Now, about $50 billion in settlement funds have begun to flow to state governments. For example, in New York, Democratic Gov. Public vigilance could help, but most states have promised little to no public reporting, making it difficult to track their use of funds. Sexual Abuse of a Minor in Indian Country; Abusive Sexual Contact with a Minor in Indian Country; Incest in Indian Country. Barajas-Morales, 44, a Mexican national, is charged with unlawfully reentering the United States after having been removed on July 17, 2007, at or near San Luis, Arizona. ERIC BARADAT/AFP via Getty Images Assistant U.S. Attorney Ben Tonkin is prosecuting the case. He is also charged with sexually abusing one of the victims who was incapable of providing consent at the time and with sexually abusing the same victim using force. The Lead Agency works with CCR&Rs to manage consumer education efforts. U.S. Attorney's Office, Northern District of Oklahoma, Federal Grand Jury A Indictments Announced-November 2022, Claremore Man Pleads Guilty After Being Found with 500+ Images of Child Pornography, Eucha Man Sentenced for Strangling an Intimate Partner. And the settlement funds are mentioned just twice in a 150-page national strategy to reduce drug trafficking and overdose deaths. Jan 14, 2022 / 04:41 PM CST. A Tulsa, Oklahoma, man sentenced to life in prison for repeatedly sexually abusing a 7-year-old girl over the course of a year has, since his conviction, decided that he is transgender and refers to himself as she/her. The defendant preyed on an innocent child solely for his own pleasure, without regard to the grievous and long-lasting harm his depraved conduct would cause, the special agent in charge of the FBIs Oklahoma City Field Office, Edward Gray, said. The FBI, Rogers County Sheriffs Office and Mayes County Sheriffs Office are the investigative agencies. But today, as billions of dollars actually start to flow and state and local leaders make crucial decisions on how to spend the more than $50 billion windfall to tackle this entrenched public health crisis, the federal government has gone mostly quiet. States lobbied Congress to forgo that claim. Today, less than 3% of the annual payouts support anti-smoking programs. But there is an expectation that the federal government, including the nation's leading agencies on mental health and addiction, should play a role. Luis Antonia Barajas-Morales. Health policy experts suggest the Biden administration could use the possibility of claiming those funds as leverage: In return for allowing states to keep the cash, it could require all of it be spent on addressing the opioid crisis or be used only for treatments backed by research. TULSA, Okla. A man was sentenced Friday in federal court for strangling an intimate partner in 2021. After all, states filed the lawsuits against companies that made, sold, or distributed opioid painkillers, including Johnson & Johnson, McKesson, and Walmart. hide caption. . O'Donnell, a Catoosa Republican, was indicted in December 2021 on five felony counts and three misdemeanors while his wife, Teresa O'Donnell, was charged with three felonies and one misdemeanor. Tulsa, OK 74119, Phone:(918) 382-2700 hide caption. In the end, all states complied. Kathy Hochul rejected a recommendation to use opioid settlement funds to support two overdose prevention centers places where people can use illicit drugs under supervision. A lock () or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. He is further alleged to have possessed a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime. He is further charged with sexual contact against the same minor. As such, under the Bureau of Prisons guidelines, the convict is eligible to serve out his sentence in a federal prison for women. According to Phil Bacharach, spokesperson for the Oklahoma attorney general's office, the state eventually reached an agreement to keep all its Purdue settlement but later pay $390,000 to the . Matthew Myers, president of the nonprofit Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, said it was a mistake for the federal government to take a back seat on the tobacco master settlement more than two decades ago. Fairchild, 33, of Claremore, is charged with sexually abusing three children between 12 and 16 years of age. USA v. Perry is a citizen of the Muscogee Nation, and the crimes occurred within the tribes reservation. 22-CR-378, Brian Keith Doty. A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States. The two are charged with aiding and abetting each other to knowingly use and maintain a residence for the purpose of storing, manufacturing, and distributing the drugs. In Oklahoma, the Department of Human Services, Child Care Services serves as the CCDF Lead Agency and is responsible for conducting eligiblity determinations, issuing payments, monitoring providers, and operating quality improvement activities. The return of an indictment is a method of informing a defendant of alleged violations of federal law, which must be proven in a court of law beyond . The agency has tried to recoup costs in at least one case. The Faces of Fentanyl Memorial at the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration headquarters in Arlington, Virginia. And there is time to build on that, since the opioid settlements will be stretched out over many years, she added. School-Age Children 110 W. 7th Street Some people question whether the Biden administration's weighing in would have much impact, given the deep political divisions in some states where local officials are eager to flout federal guidance. KFF Health News, formerly known as Kaiser Health News (KHN), is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF the independent source for health policy research, polling, and journalism. The gun malfunctioned and did not fire. "If they want, they could try and tie that money to requirements that settlement money be spent on opioids.". He is further charged with coercing and enticing two of the victims to engage in sexual activity. A national dashboard launched late last year to show nonfatal overdoses is a start. Secure .gov websites use HTTPS The FBI and Bartlesville Police Department are the investigative agencies. Now, about $50 billion in settlement funds have begun to flow to state governments. He was there when states began receiving cash from the tobacco settlement. The following year, the White House convened a meeting about the soon-to-be finalized settlements, noted that the money could support drug policy priorities, and helped create a model law that states could adopt in anticipation of receiving funds. Assistant U.S. Attorney Justin G. Bish is prosecuting the case. But Regina LaBelle, who was acting director of national drug control policy during Biden's early years and now works for Georgetown University's O'Neill Institute, says the federal government has managed to guide state policy on controversial topics before. Subscribe But there were no restrictions on the money's use and much of it went to plugging state budget gaps, filling potholes, and even subsidizing tobacco farmers. Suite 300 In 2019, CMS sent a letter to Oklahoma asking for part of the state's $270 million settlement with Purdue Pharma, maker of OxyContin. Back then, tobacco companies agreed to pay states billions annually for as long as they continued selling cigarettes. "We have an opportunity to see what's the appropriate role of the federal government," LaBelle says. Unlawful Reentry of a Removed Alien. "We know that expanding access to treatment for substance use disorder, lifesaving interventions like naloxone, and recovery support services will reduce the harms of addiction and the overdose epidemic," said Rahul Gupta, director of national drug control policy. ", When it comes to the opioid settlements, it's not clear if the federal government will try to claim repayment for Medicaid expenses linked to opioid addiction, which was estimated at $23 billion in 2019. A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States. 2023 The New York Sun Company, LLC. Advocates want to make sure it is used to treat addiction. Get FBI email alerts A lock ( Such initiatives are designed to minimize the risks of using drugs but are politically fraught, with critics saying they encourage illegal activity and supporters saying they save lives. Royce, 43, of Broken Arrow, is charged with being a felon in possession of a Marlin, 30/30 caliber lever-action rifle; a Mauser bolt-action rifle; an Iver Johnson .22 caliber bolt-action rifle; a Ruger .22 caliber revolver; a Ruger .380 caliber semi-automatic pistol; a Taurus .22 caliber pistol and 22 rounds of ammunition. At least 85% of the money states receive must be spent on opioid-related expenses. But so far, "there hasn't been a lot of federal government action on the settlement. The FBI and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosive are the investigative agencies. On or about January 11, 2022, Jimenez-Lobaina, 29, of Tulsa, intentionally possessed with intent to distribute more than 500 grams of cocaine. Assault with Intent to Commit Murder in Indian Country; Carrying, Using, and Brandishing a Firearm During and in Relation to a Crime of Violence; Assault with a Dangerous Weapon with Intent to do Bodily Harm in Indian Country. Fax: (918) 560-7938. For instance, the money could support grassroots organizations that don't have the time or ability to apply for federal grants, she said. KFF Health News is following how state and local governments use or misuse the cash through this year. Show 20 More Items, emailStay Connected VAT if applicable) The following individuals have been charged with violations of United States law in indictments returned by the Grand Jury. Under guidelines published by the Bureau of Prisons in January 2022, prison managers are instructed to consider inmates gender identity when deciding where to house those inmates. A locked padlock McCurtain County Resident Pleads Guilty to Child Abuse in Indian Country . 22-CR-163. In 2015, shortly after intravenous drug use sparked a major HIV outbreak in Scott County, Indiana, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention published a study showing other counties were similarly vulnerable. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. The return of an indictment is a method of informing a defendant of alleged violations of federal law, which must be proven in a court of law beyond a reasonable doubt to overcome a defendants presumption of innocence. Myers and other advocates asked legislators to do so only if they required states to spend at least 25% of the funds on anti-smoking efforts. The companies paying out the money are responsible for holding states to that threshold, but they're unlikely to monitor closely, legal experts say. Since Medicaid is jointly funded by the U.S. and state governments, federal authorities had a right to some of the settlement money. Assistant U.S. Attorney David A. Nasar is prosecuting the case. They are also charged with aiding and abetting each other to manufacture and possess with intent to distribute cocaine. Today, the Biden administration could provide data to similarly inform local decisions, LaBelle says. Federal charges for Drug Conspiracy is punishable by not less than 10 years imprisonment, and up to a $10,000,000 fine or both. FBI Oklahoma City 2022 Operational Successes 12.06.2022. But it has stopped short of explicitly recommending settlement funds for this purpose. Early in President Joe Biden's tenure, his administration promised to play a key role in ensuring opioid settlement funds went toward tackling the nation's addiction crisis. But it couldn't mandate states to do so. "The federal government is spending a lot of money on opioids," says Pierce, the former HHS spokesperson. It is a tribute to some of the people who have died in the country's ongoing opioid epidemic. Myers, of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, put it this way: "States will only listen to the federal government if there's a financial reason to do so.". Public policy and health experts say a vacuum of federal leadership could lead to serious wasted opportunities and missteps in the use of the billions that will be paid out over nearly two decades in what could be an unfortunate reprise of the multibillion-dollar 1998 settlement with tobacco companies. No federal employee holds the title of opioid crisis accountability coordinator. Local opposition often takes the form of "not-in-my-backyard" or questions about why certain neighborhoods bear the brunt of addiction and homelessness concerns. United States Attorney Clint Johnson today announced the results of the November 2022 Federal Grand Jury A. During the 2020 campaign, Biden had laid out a plan to appoint an "opioid crisis accountability coordinator" to support states in their lawsuits against companies accused of sparking the overdose epidemic. Nathaniel Burns, 36, and Ashley Burns, 28, both of Tulsa, are charged with conspiring to distribute and possess with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of methamphetamine, 40 grams or more of fentanyl, and cocaine. In the 1970s, the Nixon administration used a similar tactic, with federal transportation funding as the carrot. Some people hope the federal government can fill this gap in oversight. Federal Grand Jury B Indictments Announced-November 2022 Northern District of Oklahoma A similar conversation is taking place in San Francisco, with the mayor citing a lack of federal legal clarity on the issue. Check with the OK - OKLAHOMA CITY location, if you'd like to look at 2022 CHEVROLET SILVERADO for yourself. Or it could go to groups that provide sterile syringes and other supplies to people using drugs, which can't be purchased with taxpayer dollars. They are charged with possessing firearms in furtherance of their drug trafficking crimes, and finally, Daniel Burns is charged with being a felon in possession of a Glock .45 caliber lever-action rifle; an FN 9 mm semiautomatic pistol; a Smith & Wesson .45 caliber semiautomatic pistol; a Sig Sauer 9 mm semiautomatic pistol; a PWS .223 caliber rifle; a CZ 9 mm semiautomatic pistol; a Radikal, 12 gauge semiautomatic shotgun; an Anderson Manufacturing multi-caliber rifle; a DPMS .223/5.56 caliber rifle; a Glock 9X19 semiautomatic pistol; a Marlin, .270 Win rifle; a Canick 9X19 mm semiautomatic pistol; a Taurus 9 mm semiautomatic pistol; and a Sig Sauer 9 mm semiautomatic pistol. Instead, Nixon signed a law saying states could receive federal highway funding only if they lowered speed limits. Only the federal government or tribes have jurisdiction to prosecute cases that occur in Indian Country that involve Native American defendants. Below are all criminal cases in Western District of Oklahoma, for 2022, with case numbers 2022-cr-00000 through 2022-cr-00499. Robert Perry II was convicted by a federal jury in 2022 of aggravated sexual abuse of a minor after repeatedly coercing a first-grade girl into submitting to sexual acts in his man cave with offers of candy and other items and the chance to play video games with him. Former Oklahoma undersheriff indicted in federal court for allegedly hitting 3 handcuffed suspects who were allegedly not resisting arrest . It is a tribute to some of the people who have died in the country's ongoing opioid epidemic. The material on this site is protected by copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used. Two of the nineteen defendants indicted are also charged with federal firearm offenses carrying punishment of not more than 10 years imprisonment, and up to a $250,000 fine or both. But interpretations of qualifying expenses vary widely often based on state politics. Court: Tenth Circuit Oklahoma US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Type: Prisoner Petitions Habeas Corpus (General) Private Jets Inc v. QBE Insurance Corporation Filed: April 25, 2023 as 5:2023cv00342 Plaintiff: Private Jets Inc Defendant: QBE Insurance Corporation (okwd-5:2022-cr-00058-116810), USA v. Duncan (okwd-5:2022-cr-00330-118988), USA v. Duncan (okwd-5:2022-cr-00330-118989), USA v. Dyer (okwd-5:2022-cr-00209-117963), USA v. Dyer (okwd-5:2022-cr-00209-117964), USA v. Evans (okwd-5:2022-cr-00219-118189), USA v. Fields (okwd-5:2022-cr-00442-119779), USA v. Figueroa-Cifuentes (okwd-5:2022-cr-00401-119493), USA v. Franklin et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00375-119344), USA v. Franklin et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00375-119343), USA v. Franklin et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00375-119345), USA v. Fransen et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00232-118175), USA v. Garcia (okwd-5:2022-cr-00093-117121), USA v. Garcia (okwd-5:2022-cr-00093-117122), USA v. Garcia-Quevedo (okwd-5:2022-cr-00125-117399), USA v. Griffitts (okwd-5:2022-cr-00250-118372), USA v. Hall (okwd-5:2022-cr-00444-119786), USA v. Harris (okwd-5:2022-cr-00317-118826), USA v. Harrison (okwd-5:2022-cr-00230-118192), USA v. Harrison (okwd-5:2022-cr-00114-117404), USA v. Harrison (okwd-5:2022-cr-00230-118191), USA v. Harrison (okwd-5:2022-cr-00328-118991), USA v. Hawkins (okwd-5:2022-cr-00347-119024), USA v. Henderson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00078-116963), USA v. Hernandez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00251-118353), USA v. Hill (okwd-5:2022-cr-00077-116964), USA v. Hinojosa Velasquez et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00486-120093), USA v. Hinojosa Velasquez et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00486-120092), USA v. Hinton (okwd-5:2022-cr-00326-118972), USA v. Hocker (okwd-5:2022-cr-00424-119660), USA v. Hopkins et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00203-117925), USA v. Hopkins et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00203-117926), USA v. Hopkins et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00203-117924), USA v. House (okwd-5:2022-cr-00174-117723), USA v. Hugar (okwd-5:2022-cr-00092-117131), USA v. Jackson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00059-116807), USA v. Jackson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00378-119307), USA v. Jackson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00429-119680), USA v. Jackson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00059-116806), USA v. Jackson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00429-119681), USA v. Jacobs (okwd-5:2022-cr-00210-117967), USA v. James (okwd-5:2022-cr-00154-117586), USA v. James (okwd-5:2022-cr-00154-117587), USA v. Johnson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00369-119318), USA v. Jones (okwd-5:2022-cr-00345-119018), USA v. Jones (okwd-5:2022-cr-00376-119305), USA v. Jones (okwd-5:2022-cr-00039-116619), USA v. Jones (okwd-5:2022-cr-00193-117929), USA v. Jones (okwd-5:2022-cr-00178-117720), USA v. Jordan (okwd-5:2022-cr-00339-119006), USA v. Jordan (okwd-5:2022-cr-00339-119007), USA v. Kays (okwd-5:2022-cr-00040-116627), USA v. Kelley (okwd-5:2022-cr-00159-117574), USA v. Kelley (okwd-5:2022-cr-00395-119451), USA v. Killian et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00025-116486), USA v. King (okwd-5:2022-cr-00488-120116), USA v. Lack (okwd-5:2022-cr-00336-118997), USA v. Lacy (okwd-5:2022-cr-00277-118521), USA v. Lalehparvaran (okwd-5:2022-cr-00319-118800), USA v. Landers (okwd-5:2022-cr-00434-119684), USA v. Lara (okwd-5:2022-cr-00464-119934), USA v. Liles (okwd-5:2022-cr-00216-118212), USA v. Long (okwd-5:2022-cr-00256-118356), USA v. Long (okwd-5:2022-cr-00024-116483), USA v. Luo et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00449-119825), USA v. Lynch (okwd-5:2022-cr-00298-118668), USA v. Madala (okwd-5:2022-cr-00150-117583), USA v. Madison (okwd-5:2022-cr-00432-119676), USA v. Mahan (okwd-5:2022-cr-00191-117934), USA v. Manzano (okwd-5:2022-cr-00176-117714), USA v. Martin (okwd-5:2022-cr-00495-120106), USA v. Martin, et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00094-117125), USA v. Martinez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00300-118672), USA v. Martinez-Gallardo et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00462-119946), USA v. Mazariegos-Mencia (okwd-5:2022-cr-00303-118803), USA v. McCane (okwd-5:2022-cr-00213-117923), USA v. McCollum (okwd-5:2022-cr-00211-117918), USA v. McGee (okwd-5:2022-cr-00023-116480), USA v. McGinley (okwd-5:2022-cr-00122-117395), USA v. McKane (okwd-5:2022-cr-00213-117922), USA v. McKenzie (okwd-5:2022-cr-00454-119792), USA v. Medina-Gil (okwd-5:2022-cr-00487-120102), USA v. Mendez-Vasquez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00181-117736), USA v. Montijo-Varela et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00465-119952), USA v. Monts (okwd-5:2022-cr-00329-118980), USA v. Moreno (okwd-5:2022-cr-00306-118805), USA v. Moreno et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00404-119470), USA v. Moseley (okwd-5:2022-cr-00241-118341), USA v. Muhammad (okwd-5:2022-cr-00430-119665), USA v. Muhammad (okwd-5:2022-cr-00430-119666), USA v. Najera-Gutierrez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00195-117945), USA v. Nava et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00221-118214), USA v. Nguyen et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00380-119296), USA v. Nguyen et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00380-119294), USA v. Nicholas et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00079-116984), USA v. Nicholas et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00079-116982), USA v. Nicholas et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00079-116983), USA v. Ochoa-Ruiz (okwd-5:2022-cr-00472-119928), USA v. Olguin et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00294-118691), USA v. Outland (okwd-5:2022-cr-00385-119324), USA v. Padilla-Chairez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00289-118685), USA v. Parks (okwd-5:2022-cr-00297-118682), USA v. Parrish (okwd-5:2022-cr-00318-118828), USA v. Peevy (okwd-5:2022-cr-00493-120111), USA v. Plummer et al (okwd-5:2022-mj-00348), USA v. Poafpybitty (okwd-5:2022-cr-00222-118187), USA v. Pohawpatchoko (okwd-5:2022-cr-00206-117920), USA v. Porter (okwd-5:2022-cr-00164-117619), USA v. Porter (okwd-5:2022-cr-00155-117547), USA v. Prado (okwd-5:2022-cr-00299-118678), USA v. Prince (okwd-5:2022-cr-00157-117595), USA v. Ramirez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00161-117560), USA v. Ramos (okwd-5:2022-cr-00180-117716), USA v. Ramos (okwd-5:2022-cr-00180-117717), USA v. Ricketts (okwd-5:2022-cr-00168-117733), USA v. Ricketts (okwd-5:2022-cr-00168-117732), USA v. Rivera et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00152-117556), USA v. Rodriguez et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00422-119662), USA v. Rodriguez-Cordova (okwd-5:2022-cr-00471-119926), USA v. Rodriguez-Cordova (okwd-5:2022-cr-00471-119925), USA v. Rodriguez-Garcia et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00455-119814), USA v. Rodriguez-Morales (okwd-5:2022-cr-00313-118798), USA v. Romero et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00490-120078), USA v. Romero et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00490-120079), USA v. Romero et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00490-120081), USA v. Romero-Arredondo (okwd-5:2022-cr-00362-119282), USA v. Royal (okwd-5:2022-cr-00060-116813), USA v. Ruiz (okwd-5:2022-cr-00433-119671), USA v. Salaices (okwd-5:2022-cr-00461-119958), USA v. Saldivar (okwd-5:2022-cr-00451-119775), USA v. Sandoval (okwd-5:2022-cr-00235-118207), USA v. Santiago (okwd-5:2022-cr-00253-118388), USA v. Santizo-Roblero (okwd-5:2022-cr-00148-117576), USA v. Schenck (okwd-5:2022-cr-00373-119288), USA v. Schenck (okwd-5:2022-cr-00373-119289), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00095-117128), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00351-119026), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00205-117927), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00477-119949), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00275-118503), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00340-119008), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00212-117914), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00074-116952), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00427-119673), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00207-117959), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00208-117946), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00076-116946), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00156-117549), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00258-118392), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00453-119823), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00296-118666), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00374-119330), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00476-119937), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00311-118817), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00024-116482), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00406-119456), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00057-116804), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00295-118680), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00078-116962), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00209-117962), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00152-117554), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00326-118971), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00318-118827), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00319-118799), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00371-119271), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00408-119494), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00231-118161), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00316-118819), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00344-119022), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00379-119290), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00126-117353), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00341-119004), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00407-119460), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00495-120105), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00277-118520), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00317-118825), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00257-118377), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00350-119020), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00119-117382), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00455-119804), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00346-119012), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00084-117055), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00274-118516), USA v. Sealed (okwd-5:2022-cr-00233-118195), USA v. Simental (okwd-5:2022-cr-00177-117727), USA v. Simental (okwd-5:2022-cr-00177-117726), USA v. Simmons (okwd-5:2022-cr-00255-118345), USA v. Simms (okwd-5:2022-cr-00153-117571), USA v. Simms (okwd-5:2022-cr-00153-117570), USA v. Singer (okwd-5:2022-cr-00309-118809), USA v. Singer (okwd-5:2022-cr-00309-118810), USA v. Smith (okwd-5:2022-cr-00272-118506), USA v. Smith (okwd-5:2022-cr-00038-116625), USA v. Solis-Mancilla (okwd-5:2022-cr-00280-118527), USA v. Soutter (okwd-5:2022-cr-00390-119327), USA v. Stanley (okwd-5:2022-cr-00075-116951), USA v. Stanley (okwd-5:2022-cr-00075-116950), USA v. Taber (okwd-5:2022-cr-00252-118362), USA v. Tahmasebi (okwd-5:2022-cr-00037-116639), USA v. Tevalan-Ajanel (okwd-5:2022-cr-00172-117741), USA v. Thomas Jr (okwd-5:2022-cr-00410-119477), USA v. Thompson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00120-117415), USA v. To et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00450-119789), USA v. Torralba (okwd-5:2022-cr-00278-118519), USA v. Torralba (okwd-5:2022-cr-00278-118518), USA v. Urias et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00190-117939), USA v. Wang (okwd-5:2022-cr-00240-118369), USA v. Wang (okwd-5:2022-cr-00240-118370), USA v. Warren (okwd-5:2022-cr-00475-119940), USA v. Warren (okwd-5:2022-cr-00475-119939), USA v. Warren et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00123-117407), USA v. Warren et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00123-117411), USA v. Washington (okwd-5:2022-cr-00446-119788), USA v. Watkins (okwd-5:2022-cr-00325-118982), USA v. Watkins (okwd-5:2022-cr-00428-119670), USA v. Watkins (okwd-5:2022-cr-00466-119961), USA v. Welge (okwd-5:2022-cr-00365-119286), USA v. White (okwd-5:2022-cr-00121-117389), USA v. White (okwd-5:2022-cr-00179-117728), USA v. White (okwd-5:2022-cr-00179-117729), USA v. Wilkinson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00200-117952), USA v. Wood (okwd-5:2022-cr-00463-119945), USA v. Woodfork (okwd-5:2022-cr-00467-119962), USA v. Worden (okwd-5:2022-cr-00341-119005), USA v. Yates (okwd-5:2022-cr-00377-119314), USA v. Yates (okwd-5:2022-cr-00377-119313), USA v.Woodley (okwd-5:2022-cr-00348-119016), USA v.Woodley (okwd-5:2022-cr-00348-119017), United States of America v. Aguilar-Morales (okwd-5:2022-mj-00263), United States of America v. Aguilar-Torres (okwd-5:2022-mj-00031), United States of America v. Aguilar-Torres (okwd-5:2022-cr-00334-118994), United States of America v. Aguilera-Nunez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00398-119458), United States of America v. Aldama-Martinez et al (okwd-5:2022-mj-00211), United States of America v. Alston (okwd-5:2022-mj-00036), United States of America v. Alvarado-Martinez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00034-116624), United States of America v. Alvarado-Martinez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00034-116623), United States of America v. Alvarez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00292-118686), United States of America v. Alvarez (okwd-5:2022-mj-00482), United States of America v. Anderson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00142-117578), United States of America v. Anglin (okwd-5:2022-cr-00393-119466), United States of America v. Anguiano-Moncivais (okwd-5:2022-cr-00333-118998), United States of America v. Antoine (okwd-5:2022-mj-00236), United States of America v. Arano et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00441-119817), United States of America v. Arano et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00441-119820), United States of America v. Arano et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00441-119819), United States of America v. Arano et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00441-119818), United States of America v. Arano et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00441-119816), United States of America v. Arnett (okwd-5:2022-cr-00491-120113), United States of America v. Arrellano et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00087-117116), United States of America v. Arrellano et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00087-117117), United States of America v. Arroyo et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00239-118347), United States of America v. Arroyo et al (okwd-5:2022-mj-00400), United States of America v. Austin (okwd-5:2022-mj-00096), United States of America v. Avilla-Arrellano et al (okwd-5:2022-mj-00110), United States of America v. Bacca (okwd-5:2022-mj-00123), United States of America v. Baeza-Medrano et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00005-116348), United States of America v. Baeza-Medrano et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00005-116359), United States of America v. Baeza-Medrano et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00005-116362), United States of America v. Baeza-Medrano et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00005-116355), United States of America v. Bailey (okwd-5:2022-mj-00420), United States of America v. Barcenas-Velasquez (okwd-5:2022-mj-00030), United States of America v. Barcenas-Velasquez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00061-116746), United States of America v. Barkus (okwd-5:2022-mj-00396), United States of America v. Barrios (okwd-5:2022-cr-00312-118821), United States of America v. Barron-Orquiz (okwd-5:2022-cr-00364-119275), United States of America v. Battiest (okwd-5:2022-cr-00261-118409), United States of America v. Bedwell (okwd-5:2022-mj-00353), United States of America v. Been (okwd-5:2022-cr-00268-118499), United States of America v. Bell (okwd-5:2022-cr-00266-118497), United States of America v. Benavidez (okwd-5:2022-mj-00478), United States of America v. Benfall (okwd-5:2022-cr-00417-119682), United States of America v. Bennett (okwd-5:2022-cr-00263-118475), United States of America v. Benson et al (okwd-5:2022-mj-00252), United States of America v. Bernabe-Chagollan (okwd-5:2022-cr-00259-118331), United States of America v. Bernabe-Chagollan (okwd-5:2022-mj-00135), United States of America v. Berry (okwd-5:2022-cr-00248-118364), United States of America v. Biggs (okwd-5:2022-cr-00030-116614), United States of America v. Biggs (okwd-5:2022-mj-00052), United States of America v. Bishop (okwd-5:2022-cr-00416-119635), United States of America v. Black (okwd-5:2022-mj-00484), United States of America v. Bliffin (okwd-5:2022-mj-00024), United States of America v. Blitch (okwd-5:2022-cr-00414-119592), United States of America v. Blodgett (okwd-5:2022-cr-00063-116931), United States of America v. Blodgett (okwd-5:2022-cr-00062-116929), United States of America v. Bomgren (okwd-5:2022-cr-00194-117916), United States of America v. Bomgren (okwd-5:2022-mj-00275), United States of America v. Bond (okwd-5:2022-cr-00264-118509), United States of America v. Bourdeau (okwd-5:2022-mj-00235), United States of America v. Bralley (okwd-5:2022-cr-00355-119033), United States of America v. Brand (okwd-5:2022-cr-00002-116330), United States of America v. Brand (okwd-5:2022-cr-00002-116331), United States of America v. Breese et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00068-116959), United States of America v. Breese et al (okwd-5:2022-mj-00086), United States of America v. Brown (okwd-5:2022-mj-00051), United States of America v. Brown (okwd-5:2022-cr-00496-120171), United States of America v. Brown (okwd-5:2022-cr-00097-117186), United States of America v. Buckaloo (okwd-5:2022-cr-00011-116510), United States of America v. Buford (okwd-5:2022-cr-00265-118495), United States of America v. Buford (okwd-5:2022-cr-00473-119942), United States of America v. Buford (okwd-5:2022-mj-00446), United States of America v. Bulock (okwd-5:2022-cr-00426-119663), United States of America v. Butler (okwd-5:2022-mj-00301), United States of America v. Campbell (okwd-5:2022-cr-00138-117601), United States of America v. Cantu (okwd-5:2022-cr-00117-117363), United States of America v. Cantwell (okwd-5:2022-mj-00035), United States of America v. Carbajal-Badillo (okwd-5:2022-cr-00445-119794), United States of America v. Cardenas (okwd-5:2022-cr-00391-119268), United States of America v. Casasnovas (okwd-5:2022-cr-00198-117948), United States of America v. Casasnovas et al (okwd-5:2022-mj-00233), United States of America v. Castro (okwd-5:2022-mj-00064), United States of America v. Chavez-Gomez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00082-117064), United States of America v. Chen (okwd-5:2022-cr-00305-118801), United States of America v. Church (okwd-5:2022-mj-00164), United States of America v. Clague (okwd-5:2022-mj-00087), United States of America v. Clayton (okwd-5:2022-cr-00047-116862), United States of America v. Clemente-Mendez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00146-117580), United States of America v. Clemente-Mendez (okwd-5:2022-mj-00256), United States of America v. Coleman et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00035-116629), United States of America v. Cook (okwd-5:2022-cr-00361-119252), United States of America v. Cooke (okwd-5:2022-cr-00457-119921), United States of America v. Cooper (okwd-5:2022-cr-00301-118712), United States of America v. Cox (okwd-5:2022-cr-00284-118664), United States of America v. Cox (okwd-5:2022-mj-00474), United States of America v. Crawford (okwd-5:2022-mj-00303), United States of America v. Cruz-Torres (okwd-5:2022-cr-00225-118159), United States of America v. Dalton et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00001-116334), United States of America v. Davis (okwd-5:2022-mj-00025), United States of America v. Davis (okwd-5:2022-cr-00478-119965), United States of America v. Davis (okwd-5:2022-cr-00358-119141), United States of America v. Dawson (okwd-5:2022-mj-00465), United States of America v. Day (okwd-5:2022-cr-00412-119542), United States of America v. De La Cruz Florentino et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00086-117113), United States of America v. De La Cruz Florentino et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00086-117114), United States of America v. De La Cruz Florentino et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00086-117115), United States of America v. De Lara-Rojas (okwd-5:2022-mj-00383), United States of America v. De Lara-Rojas (okwd-5:2022-mj-00386), United States of America v. De Lara-Rojas (okwd-5:2022-cr-00260-118333), United States of America v. Deyo (okwd-5:2022-cr-00413-119583), United States of America v. Diaz-Bustamante (okwd-5:2022-cr-00485-120097), United States of America v. Donaldson (okwd-5:2022-mj-00059), United States of America v. Dooley (okwd-5:2022-cr-00360-119209), United States of America v. Downes (okwd-5:2022-cr-00187-117796), United States of America v. Downes (okwd-5:2022-cr-00188-117798), United States of America v. Dyson (okwd-5:2022-mj-00227), United States of America v. Dyson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00112-117427), United States of America v. Earnest (okwd-5:2022-mj-00165), United States of America v. Easton (okwd-5:2022-mj-00395), United States of America v. Edmond (okwd-5:2022-mj-00186), United States of America v. Espinoza (okwd-5:2022-cr-00167-117744), United States of America v. Estrada-Ramirez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00227-118167), United States of America v. Evans (okwd-5:2022-mj-00341), United States of America v. Falany (okwd-5:2022-mj-00038), United States of America v. Felty (okwd-5:2022-mj-00166), United States of America v. Fenstermacher (okwd-5:2022-mj-00167), United States of America v. Ferreris (okwd-5:2022-cr-00459-119771), United States of America v. Ferreris (okwd-5:2022-cr-00459-119770), United States of America v. Fierro-Zaragoza (okwd-5:2022-cr-00017-116516), United States of America v. Figueroa (okwd-5:2022-cr-00140-117599), United States of America v. Figueroa (okwd-5:2022-mj-00242), United States of America v. Figueroa-Cifuentes (okwd-5:2022-cr-00401-119492), United States of America v. Finto (okwd-5:2022-mj-00094), United States of America v. Finto (okwd-5:2022-cr-00071-116970), United States of America v. Flores (okwd-5:2022-mj-00056), United States of America v. Flores et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00066-116956), United States of America v. Flores et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00066-116957), United States of America v. Flores-Guerrero (okwd-5:2022-cr-00055-116800), United States of America v. Fonseca (okwd-5:2022-cr-00132-117539), United States of America v. Ford (okwd-5:2022-cr-00009-116376), United States of America v. Ford (okwd-5:2022-cr-00443-119781), United States of America v. Ford (okwd-5:2022-mj-00187), United States of America v. Foster (okwd-5:2022-cr-00387-119311), United States of America v. Fowler (okwd-5:2022-cr-00366-119299), United States of America v. Fowler (okwd-5:2022-mj-00422), United States of America v. Fowler (okwd-5:2022-mj-00479), United States of America v. Fox (okwd-5:2022-mj-00197), United States of America v. Fraire-Aldaba (okwd-5:2022-mj-00089), United States of America v. Fraire-Aldaba (okwd-5:2022-cr-00085-117072), United States of America v. Francois (okwd-5:2022-mj-00421), United States of America v. Franklin (okwd-5:2022-cr-00370-119302), United States of America v. Frederick (okwd-5:2022-cr-00110-117391), United States of America v. Gallardo-Carbajal (okwd-5:2022-cr-00290-118674), United States of America v. Garcia (okwd-5:2022-mj-00429), United States of America v. Garcia-Ruiz (okwd-5:2022-cr-00332-118992), United States of America v. Garrett (okwd-5:2022-cr-00489-120109), United States of America v. Garza (okwd-5:2022-cr-00215-118140), United States of America v. Gaskin (okwd-5:2022-cr-00286-118670), United States of America v. Gaxiola-Reynaga (okwd-5:2022-cr-00056-116794), United States of America v. Gaxiola-Reynaga (okwd-5:2022-cr-00056-116795), United States of America v. Geimausaddle (okwd-5:2022-cr-00439-119839), United States of America v. Gildon (okwd-5:2022-cr-00115-117401), United States of America v. Gill (okwd-5:2022-cr-00460-119844), United States of America v. Gillispie (okwd-5:2022-cr-00415-119603), United States of America v. Glaze (okwd-5:2022-cr-00425-119691), United States of America v. Glick (okwd-5:2022-mj-00188), United States of America v. Goins (okwd-5:2022-cr-00100-117304), United States of America v. Golden (okwd-5:2022-mj-00124), United States of America v. Goldsmith (okwd-5:2022-cr-00065-116948), United States of America v. Goleman (okwd-5:2022-mj-00423), United States of America v. Gomez (okwd-5:2022-mj-00424), United States of America v. Gomez-Nava (okwd-5:2022-cr-00070-116974), United States of America v. Gomez-Nava (okwd-5:2022-mj-00108), United States of America v. Gonzales (okwd-5:2022-mj-00350), United States of America v. Gonzales (okwd-5:2022-mj-00352), United States of America v. Gonzales (okwd-5:2022-mj-00282), United States of America v. Gonzalez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00080-116927), United States of America v. Gonzalez-Franco (okwd-5:2022-cr-00363-119277), United States of America v. Gonzalez-Zaragoza (okwd-5:2022-mj-00379), United States of America v. Gonzalez-Zaragoza (okwd-5:2022-cr-00226-118209), United States of America v. Gottfried (okwd-5:2022-cr-00423-119689), United States of America v. Granados (okwd-5:2022-cr-00081-117034), United States of America v. Grant (okwd-5:2022-cr-00145-117545), United States of America v. Green (okwd-5:2022-cr-00384-119337), United States of America v. Green (okwd-5:2022-mj-00016), United States of America v. Green (okwd-5:2022-mj-00063), United States of America v. Green (okwd-5:2022-mj-00208), United States of America v. Green et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00033-116634), United States of America v. Green et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00033-116636), United States of America v. Gress (okwd-5:2022-cr-00479-119973), United States of America v. Griffith (okwd-5:2022-mj-00209), United States of America v. Griffitts (okwd-5:2022-cr-00250-118371), United States of America v. Guardiola-Gamez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00162-117642), United States of America v. Guedea (okwd-5:2022-cr-00237-118277), United States of America v. Guffey (okwd-5:2022-mj-00185), United States of America v. Gutierrez-Angeles (okwd-5:2022-cr-00051-116818), United States of America v. Haitshan (okwd-5:2022-mj-00023), United States of America v. Hall (okwd-5:2022-cr-00444-119785), United States of America v. Hamilton (okwd-5:2022-cr-00314-118815), United States of America v. Hardimon (okwd-5:2022-cr-00327-118984), United States of America v. Harmon (okwd-5:2022-cr-00192-117931), United States of America v. Harris (okwd-5:2022-cr-00381-119325), United States of America v. Harris (okwd-5:2022-cr-00021-116493), United States of America v. Harris (okwd-5:2022-cr-00021-116494), United States of America v. Harrison (okwd-5:2022-cr-00328-118990), United States of America v. Harrison (okwd-5:2022-cr-00114-117403), United States of America v. Harvey (okwd-5:2022-cr-00356-119076), United States of America v. Hebb (okwd-5:2022-mj-00461), United States of America v. Hedge et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00267-118511), United States of America v. Henderson et al (okwd-5:2022-mj-00044), United States of America v. Hennings (okwd-5:2022-cr-00113-117429), United States of America v. Hennings (okwd-5:2022-mj-00133), United States of America v. Hernandez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00251-118352), United States of America v. Hernandez (okwd-5:2022-mj-00178), United States of America v. Hernandez et al (okwd-5:2022-mj-00349), United States of America v. Hernandez-Alvarado (okwd-5:2022-cr-00147-117572), United States of America v. Hernandez-Campos (okwd-5:2022-cr-00020-116476), United States of America v. Hernandez-Contreras (okwd-5:2022-mj-00076), United States of America v. Herrera-Medina (okwd-5:2022-mj-00180), United States of America v. Hill (okwd-5:2022-cr-00189-117815), United States of America v. Hill (okwd-5:2022-mj-00116), United States of America v. Hilliard (okwd-5:2022-cr-00499-120238), United States of America v. Hinojosa-Velasquez et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00486-120091), United States of America v. Hocker (okwd-5:2022-cr-00424-119659), United States of America v. Holder (okwd-5:2022-cr-00141-117562), United States of America v. Holder (okwd-5:2022-mj-00268), United States of America v. Hollis (okwd-5:2022-mj-00077), United States of America v. Hooee (okwd-5:2022-mj-00169), United States of America v. Hooper (okwd-5:2022-cr-00165-117649), United States of America v. Hopper (okwd-5:2022-mj-00266), United States of America v. Horn (okwd-5:2022-mj-00425), United States of America v. House (okwd-5:2022-cr-00174-117722), United States of America v. Howard (okwd-5:2022-cr-00010-116390), United States of America v. Howland (okwd-5:2022-cr-00438-119777), United States of America v. Hubbard (okwd-5:2022-cr-00106-117419), United States of America v. Hull (okwd-5:2022-cr-00050-116792), United States of America v. Hull (okwd-5:2022-mj-00302), United States of America v. Hunt (okwd-5:2022-mj-00174), United States of America v. Hunt (okwd-5:2022-cr-00107-117385), United States of America v. Hurd (okwd-5:2022-cr-00109-117424), United States of America v. Hurst (okwd-5:2022-cr-00083-117080), United States of America v. Hurst (okwd-5:2022-mj-00201), United States of America v. Hurst (okwd-5:2022-cr-00083-117081), United States of America v. Idell (okwd-5:2022-cr-00447-119796), United States of America v. Isbill (okwd-5:2022-mj-00274), United States of America v. Jackson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00419-119678), United States of America v. Jamison (okwd-5:2022-mj-00463), United States of America v. Jaramillo-Orozco (okwd-5:2022-cr-00285-118662), United States of America v. Johnson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00028-116565), United States of America v. Johnson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00369-119317), United States of America v. Johnson (okwd-5:2022-mj-00315), United States of America v. Jolliffe (okwd-5:2022-mj-00351), United States of America v. Jones (okwd-5:2022-cr-00129-117462), United States of America v. Jones (okwd-5:2022-mj-00450), United States of America v. Jones (okwd-5:2022-mj-00304), United States of America v. Kassanavoid (okwd-5:2022-cr-00185-117764), United States of America v. Kelley (okwd-5:2022-cr-00395-119450), United States of America v. Kennedy (okwd-5:2022-cr-00088-117109), United States of America v. Khan (okwd-5:2022-cr-00281-118576), United States of America v. Kidd (okwd-5:2022-mj-00006), United States of America v. Killough (okwd-5:2022-cr-00186-117786), United States of America v. King (okwd-5:2022-cr-00488-120115), United States of America v. King (okwd-5:2022-mj-00184), United States of America v. Lack (okwd-5:2022-cr-00336-118996), United States of America v. Lara (okwd-5:2022-cr-00464-119933), United States of America v. Laster (okwd-5:2022-cr-00046-116644), United States of America v. Law (okwd-5:2022-cr-00236-118216), United States of America v. Law (okwd-5:2022-cr-00236-118217), United States of America v. Leatherwood (okwd-5:2022-mj-00449), United States of America v. Lebron (okwd-5:2022-mj-00078), United States of America v. Lewis (okwd-5:2022-mj-00007), United States of America v. Lewis (okwd-5:2022-mj-00314), United States of America v. Lewis (okwd-5:2022-cr-00368-119284), United States of America v. Liles (okwd-5:2022-cr-00216-118211), United States of America v. Little (okwd-5:2022-mj-00444), United States of America v. Littlejohn (okwd-5:2022-mj-00161), United States of America v. Littlejohn (okwd-5:2022-cr-00102-117393), United States of America v. Loera-Macias (okwd-5:2022-cr-00480-119968), United States of America v. Long (okwd-5:2022-cr-00440-119748), United States of America v. Longman (okwd-5:2022-cr-00151-117564), United States of America v. Longman (okwd-5:2022-mj-00247), United States of America v. Lopez et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00420-119686), United States of America v. Lopez-Nava et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00221-118213), United States of America v. Lopez-Ramirez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00304-118795), United States of America v. Lopez-Segura (okwd-5:2022-cr-00196-117942), United States of America v. Lopez-Segura (okwd-5:2022-mj-00325), United States of America v. Lopez-Zavala et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00004-116343), United States of America v. Lopez-Zavala et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00004-116344), United States of America v. Lopez-Zavala et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00004-116345), United States of America v. Lozania-Hernandez (okwd-5:2022-mj-00183), United States of America v. Lucas (okwd-5:2022-mj-00480), United States of America v. Lucas (okwd-5:2022-mj-00477), United States of America v. Luper (okwd-5:2022-cr-00096-117253), United States of America v. Lusio-Flores (okwd-5:2022-cr-00418-119638), United States of America v. Machado (okwd-5:2022-mj-00254), United States of America v. Machado-Soto (okwd-5:2022-cr-00484-120107), United States of America v. Macias-Ramirez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00053-116808), United States of America v. Madala (okwd-5:2022-cr-00150-117582), United States of America v. Madden (okwd-5:2022-cr-00026-116412), United States of America v. Maese-Luna (okwd-5:2022-cr-00399-119473), United States of America v. Maese-Munoz (okwd-5:2022-cr-00054-116802), United States of America v. Maese-Munoz (okwd-5:2022-mj-00073), United States of America v. Mahan (okwd-5:2022-cr-00191-117933), United States of America v. Maher (okwd-5:2022-mj-00354), United States of America v. Maley (okwd-5:2022-cr-00435-119622), United States of America v. Maley (okwd-5:2022-cr-00435-119621), United States of America v. Mansel (okwd-5:2022-mj-00340), United States of America v. Marris (okwd-5:2022-cr-00197-117937), United States of America v. Marris (okwd-5:2022-mj-00323), United States of America v. Martin (okwd-5:2022-mj-00361), United States of America v. Martin (okwd-5:2022-mj-00230), United States of America v. Martin (okwd-5:2022-cr-00223-118171), United States of America v. Martin (okwd-5:2022-cr-00302-118709), United States of America v. Martin (okwd-5:2022-cr-00137-117591), United States of America v. Martinez et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00199-117954), United States of America v. Martinez-Rincon (okwd-5:2022-cr-00052-116816), United States of America v. Martinie-Ontiveros (okwd-5:2022-cr-00245-118375), United States of America v. Mays (okwd-5:2022-mj-00008), United States of America v. Mays (okwd-5:2022-mj-00170), United States of America v. Mazariegos-Mencia (okwd-5:2022-mj-00495), United States of America v. McAlister (okwd-5:2022-mj-00462), United States of America v. McClain (okwd-5:2022-cr-00027-116414), United States of America v. McClinton (okwd-5:2022-cr-00032-116621), United States of America v. McClinton (okwd-5:2022-cr-00032-116622), United States of America v. McClinton (okwd-5:2022-mj-00019), United States of America v. McCullough (okwd-5:2022-cr-00293-118698), United States of America v. McDonald (okwd-5:2022-mj-00129), United States of America v. McDonald (okwd-5:2022-mj-00125), United States of America v. McGuire (okwd-5:2022-cr-00482-120103), United States of America v. McKay et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00015-116473), United States of America v. Mead (okwd-5:2022-mj-00305), United States of America v. Meadows (okwd-5:2022-mj-00004), United States of America v. Medina-Gamez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00224-118173), United States of America v. Medina-Gil (okwd-5:2022-cr-00487-120101), United States of America v. Mendez-Porto (okwd-5:2022-cr-00396-119490), United States of America v. Merit (okwd-5:2022-mj-00009), United States of America v. Mihelic (okwd-5:2022-mj-00026), United States of America v. Miles (okwd-5:2022-cr-00105-117380), United States of America v. Miller (okwd-5:2022-mj-00355), United States of America v. Miller (okwd-5:2022-cr-00073-116954), United States of America v. Miller (okwd-5:2022-cr-00003-116328), United States of America v. Miller et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00218-118184), United States of America v. Mireles-Moreno (okwd-5:2022-cr-00400-119483), United States of America v. Mitchell (okwd-5:2022-mj-00202), United States of America v. Mitchell (okwd-5:2022-cr-00322-118973), United States of America v. Modesto-Hernandez (okwd-5:2022-mj-00238), United States of America v. Modesto-Hernandez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00335-119031), United States of America v. Molina-Molina (okwd-5:2022-mj-00172), United States of America v. Molina-Molina (okwd-5:2022-cr-00090-117119), United States of America v. Montijo-Varela et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00465-119951), United States of America v. Monts (okwd-5:2022-cr-00329-118979), United States of America v. Moore (okwd-5:2022-cr-00171-117724), United States of America v. Moore (okwd-5:2022-mj-00037), United States of America v. Morales-Elizalde (okwd-5:2022-mj-00103), United States of America v. Morales-Elizalde (okwd-5:2022-cr-00069-116976), United States of America v. Morales-Elizalde (okwd-5:2022-cr-00069-116977), United States of America v. Morales-Hernandez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00242-118358), United States of America v. Morales-Mata (okwd-5:2022-cr-00279-118493), United States of America v. Morales-Mata (okwd-5:2022-mj-00382), United States of America v. Moreno et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00404-119468), United States of America v. Morris (okwd-5:2022-cr-00175-117712), United States of America v. Morris (okwd-5:2022-mj-00027), United States of America v. Moseley (okwd-5:2022-cr-00116-117413), United States of America v. Najera-Gutierrez (okwd-5:2022-mj-00347), United States of America v. Najera-Gutierrez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00195-117944), United States of America v. Nava-Guerra (okwd-5:2022-mj-00374), United States of America v. Nelson (okwd-5:2022-mj-00010), United States of America v. Nelson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00324-118977), United States of America v. Nguyen (okwd-5:2022-mj-00460), United States of America v. Nichols (okwd-5:2022-cr-00103-117431), United States of America v. Northcutt (okwd-5:2022-cr-00098-117213), United States of America v. Ochoa-Ruiz (okwd-5:2022-cr-00472-119927), United States of America v. Ochoa-Santos et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00049-116798), United States of America v. Ochoa-Santos et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00049-116796), United States of America v. Olmedo-Acevedo (okwd-5:2022-cr-00497-120181), United States of America v. Ontiveros-Martinez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00101-117405), United States of America v. Ontiveros-Martinez (okwd-5:2022-mj-00163), United States of America v. Orellana (okwd-5:2022-cr-00019-116508), United States of America v. Orellana (okwd-5:2022-cr-00019-116509), United States of America v. Ortiz (okwd-5:2022-cr-00321-119058), United States of America v. Ortiz-Rodriguez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00397-119479), United States of America v. Osuna (okwd-5:2022-cr-00217-118193), United States of America v. Osuna (okwd-5:2022-mj-00496), United States of America v. Osuna (okwd-5:2022-cr-00405-119464), United States of America v. Osuna (okwd-5:2022-cr-00308-118813), United States of America v. Outland (okwd-5:2022-cr-00385-119323), United States of America v. Owens (okwd-5:2022-cr-00273-118501), United States of America v. Padilla-Chairez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00289-118684), United States of America v. Palma-Castellanos (okwd-5:2022-cr-00483-120089), United States of America v. Patino-Delgado (okwd-5:2022-cr-00089-117111), United States of America v. Paulick (okwd-5:2022-cr-00144-117568), United States of America v. Pennington (okwd-5:2022-cr-00022-116478), United States of America v. Perdomo (okwd-5:2022-mj-00090), United States of America v. Perez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00064-117069), United States of America v. Perez-Barrera (okwd-5:2022-cr-00359-119165), United States of America v. Perez-Lopez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00270-118525), United States of America v. Perez-Ruiz (okwd-5:2022-cr-00498-120055), United States of America v. Perez-Torres (okwd-5:2022-cr-00173-117738), United States of America v. Perez-Torres (okwd-5:2022-mj-00285), United States of America v. Peterson (okwd-5:2022-mj-00139), United States of America v. Peuplie (okwd-5:2022-cr-00437-119702), United States of America v. Pihl (okwd-5:2022-mj-00203), United States of America v. Ping Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00225), United States of America v. Pitts (okwd-5:2022-cr-00104-117359), United States of America v. Plummer et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00247-118366), United States of America v. Polite (okwd-5:2022-cr-00249-118373), United States of America v. Polly (okwd-5:2022-cr-00383-119309), United States of America v. Ponce Vargas (okwd-5:2022-cr-00136-117566), United States of America v. Ponce Vargas (okwd-5:2022-mj-00240), United States of America v. Porter (okwd-5:2022-cr-00166-117647), United States of America v. Porter et al (okwd-5:2022-mj-00034), United States of America v. Powell (okwd-5:2022-cr-00382-119339), United States of America v. Puentas (okwd-5:2022-mj-00467), United States of America v. Puentes (okwd-5:2022-cr-00337-119000), United States of America v. Purkey (okwd-5:2022-mj-00057), United States of America v. Quijivix et al (okwd-5:2022-mj-00384), United States of America v. Ramirez-Castaneda (okwd-5:2022-cr-00244-118384), United States of America v. Rangel-Melendez (okwd-5:2022-mj-00397), United States of America v. Rangel-Melendez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00238-118302), United States of America v. Rasberry (okwd-5:2022-cr-00214-117880), United States of America v. Ray (okwd-5:2022-cr-00072-116986), United States of America v. Rayford (okwd-5:2022-mj-00381), United States of America v. Red Elk (okwd-5:2022-mj-00306), United States of America v. Redd (okwd-5:2022-mj-00430), United States of America v. Redd (okwd-5:2022-mj-00267), United States of America v. Reich et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00031-116617), United States of America v. Reich et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00031-116616), United States of America v. Reich et al (okwd-5:2022-mj-00017), United States of America v. Reich et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00031-116618), United States of America v. Rendon-Fraire (okwd-5:2022-cr-00470-119954), United States of America v. Resendiz-Olguin (okwd-5:2022-mj-00475), United States of America v. Reves (okwd-5:2022-mj-00321), United States of America v. Reyes (okwd-5:2022-cr-00127-117342), United States of America v. Ritchie (okwd-5:2022-cr-00392-119441), United States of America v. Rivera (okwd-5:2022-mj-00419), United States of America v. Robinson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00043-116695), United States of America v. Robledo (okwd-5:2022-cr-00041-116603), United States of America v. Robledo-Chavez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00353-118957), United States of America v. Robledo-Chavez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00243-118360), United States of America v. Robledo-Chavez (okwd-5:2022-mj-00437), United States of America v. Rocha De Lucena (okwd-5:2022-mj-00168), United States of America v. Rodas-Mendez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00269-118507), United States of America v. Rodriguez (okwd-5:2022-mj-00457), United States of America v. Rodriguez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00320-118775), United States of America v. Rodriguez (okwd-5:2022-mj-00426), United States of America v. Rodriguez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00422-119661), United States of America v. Rodriguez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00320-118774), United States of America v. Rodriguez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00262-118396), United States of America v. Rodriguez Ortega et al (okwd-5:2022-mj-00085), United States of America v. Rodriguez-Bernal (okwd-5:2022-mj-00415), United States of America v. Rodriguez-Bernal (okwd-5:2022-cr-00282-118581), United States of America v. Rodriguez-Bernal (okwd-5:2022-cr-00282-118582), United States of America v. Rodriguez-Cruz (okwd-5:2022-cr-00469-119931), United States of America v. Rodriguez-Herrera (okwd-5:2022-cr-00288-118676), United States of America v. Rodriguez-Herrera (okwd-5:2022-cr-00099-117312), United States of America v. Rodriguez-Morales (okwd-5:2022-cr-00313-118797), United States of America v. Rogers (okwd-5:2022-mj-00358), United States of America v. Rogers (okwd-5:2022-mj-00173), United States of America v. Rogers (okwd-5:2022-cr-00135-117584), United States of America v. Rojas (okwd-5:2022-mj-00014), United States of America v. Rojas (okwd-5:2022-mj-00312), United States of America v. Rojo Alvarado (okwd-5:2022-cr-00307-118807), United States of America v. Romero-Mendoza (okwd-5:2022-cr-00468-119929), United States of America v. Ross (okwd-5:2022-mj-00079), United States of America v. Ruelas-Pena (okwd-5:2022-cr-00118-117397), United States of America v. Ruelas-Pena (okwd-5:2022-mj-00162), United States of America v. Ruiz et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00291-118695), United States of America v. Sandefur (okwd-5:2022-mj-00126), United States of America v. Sapcut (okwd-5:2022-mj-00105), United States of America v. Sapcut (okwd-5:2022-cr-00091-117123), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00190), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00404), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00405), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00080), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00177), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00192), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00364), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00385), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00143), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00489), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00112), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00249), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00199), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00339), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00370), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00198), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00371), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00375), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00191), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00335), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00394), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00403), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00043), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00104), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00226), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00338), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00109), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00248), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00332), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00373), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00439), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00070), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00101), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00114), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00406), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00497), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00311), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00487), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00111), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00140), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00333), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00491), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00369), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00102), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00115), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00144), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00147), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00336), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00042), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00492), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00122), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00337), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00176), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00222), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00410), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00040), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00250), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00440), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00389), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00451), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00365), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00368), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00372), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00402), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00409), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00098), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00407), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00041), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00075), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00408), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00486), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00039), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00050), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00074), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00069), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00113), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00488), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00490), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00158), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00265), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00141), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00148), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00367), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00100), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00366), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00088), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00099), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00193), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00334), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00046), United States of America v. Search Warrant (okwd-5:2022-mj-00346), United States of America v. Segundo-Pacheco (okwd-5:2022-cr-00402-119486), United States of America v. Shannon (okwd-5:2022-cr-00128-117433), United States of America v. Shaputis (okwd-5:2022-cr-00474-119935), United States of America v. Shaw (okwd-5:2022-cr-00013-116498), United States of America v. Shaw (okwd-5:2022-cr-00013-116497), United States of America v. Shepherd (okwd-5:2022-mj-00307), United States of America v. Shockey (okwd-5:2022-mj-00142), United States of America v. Simmons (okwd-5:2022-mj-00127), United States of America v. Simpson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00139-117593), United States of America v. Smith (okwd-5:2022-mj-00442), United States of America v. Smith (okwd-5:2022-cr-00283-118737), United States of America v. Smith (okwd-5:2022-cr-00272-118505), United States of America v. Solis-Mancilla (okwd-5:2022-mj-00428), United States of America v. South (okwd-5:2022-cr-00131-117597), United States of America v. Speal (okwd-5:2022-cr-00130-117492), United States of America v. Spikes (okwd-5:2022-mj-00356), United States of America v. Stark (okwd-5:2022-cr-00220-118178), United States of America v. Stephens (okwd-5:2022-cr-00310-118811), United States of America v. Stilley (okwd-5:2022-cr-00357-119092), United States of America v. Stinnett (okwd-5:2022-cr-00458-119772), United States of America v. Strange (okwd-5:2022-mj-00132), United States of America v. Stutson (okwd-5:2022-cr-00331-118986), United States of America v. Surber (okwd-5:2022-cr-00042-116610), United States of America v. Sutherland (okwd-5:2022-mj-00316), United States of America v. Tagle (okwd-5:2022-mj-00060), United States of America v. Tenpenny (okwd-5:2022-cr-00029-116555), United States of America v. Tevelan-Ajanel (okwd-5:2022-mj-00273), United States of America v. Thomas (okwd-5:2022-cr-00016-116502), United States of America v. Thomas (okwd-5:2022-cr-00016-116503), United States of America v. Thompson (okwd-5:2022-mj-00062), United States of America v. Tiger (okwd-5:2022-cr-00481-120057), United States of America v. Tolliver (okwd-5:2022-cr-00315-118823), United States of America v. Torres-Cervantes (okwd-5:2022-cr-00018-116491), United States of America v. Trizon-Gutierrez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00134-117541), United States of America v. Trizon-Gutierrez (okwd-5:2022-mj-00210), United States of America v. Tucker (okwd-5:2022-cr-00354-119171), United States of America v. Urias (okwd-5:2022-mj-00318), United States of America v. Urias et al (okwd-5:2022-mj-00241), United States of America v. Utley (okwd-5:2022-mj-00494), United States of America v. Valdez (okwd-5:2022-mj-00097), United States of America v. Valdez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00067-116980), United States of America v. Valdez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00067-116981), United States of America v. Valdez Silva (okwd-5:2022-mj-00028), United States of America v. Valentin (okwd-5:2022-cr-00436-119633), United States of America v. Valle (okwd-5:2022-cr-00352-118954), United States of America v. Vargas (okwd-5:2022-cr-00246-118354), United States of America v. Vargas et al (okwd-5:2022-cr-00149-117551), United States of America v. Vargas et al (okwd-5:2022-mj-00401), United States of America v. Vasquez (okwd-5:2022-cr-00036-116632), United States of America v. Venegas-Reyes (okwd-5:2022-cr-00012-116495), United States of America v. Walker (okwd-5:2022-mj-00061), United States of America v. Walters (okwd-5:2022-cr-00394-119462), United States of America v. Walters (okwd-5:2022-mj-00464), United States of America v. Walters (okwd-5:2022-mj-00204), United States of America v. Warden (okwd-5:2022-cr-00228-118169), United States of America v. Warren (okwd-5:2022-cr-00421-119640), United States of America v. Washington (okwd-5:2022-cr-00446-119787), United States of America v. Watkins (okwd-5:2022-cr-00428-119669), United States of America v. Watkins (okwd-5:2022-cr-00466-119960), United States of America v. Watkins (okwd-5:2022-cr-00325-118981), United States of America v. Watson (okwd-5:2022-mj-00281), United States of America v. Webb (okwd-5:2022-cr-00323-118975), United States of America v. Wemyss (okwd-5:2022-mj-00065), United States of America v. West (okwd-5:2022-cr-00403-119488), United States of America v. Wetzel (okwd-5:2022-mj-00357), United States of America v. Wheeler (okwd-5:2022-cr-00014-116500), United States of America v. Wheeler (okwd-5:2022-cr-00014-116499), United States of America v. Widner (okwd-5:2022-mj-00234), United States of America v. Williams (okwd-5:2022-cr-00008-116366), United States of America v. Williams (okwd-5:2022-cr-00170-117730), United States of America v. Williams (okwd-5:2022-cr-00045-116683), United States of America v. Williams (okwd-5:2022-cr-00448-119821), United States of America v. Willis (okwd-5:2022-cr-00108-117387), United States of America v. Wolf (okwd-5:2022-mj-00308), United States of America v. Wolfe (okwd-5:2022-mj-00128), United States of America v. Wood (okwd-5:2022-cr-00463-119944), United States of America v. Worden (okwd-5:2022-cr-00367-119279), United States of America v. Worden (okwd-5:2022-mj-00068), United States of America v. Young (okwd-5:2022-cr-00492-120099), United States of America v. Zuniga-Magdaleno (okwd-5:2022-cr-00048-116674), United States of America v. Zuniga-Magdaleno (okwd-5:2022-mj-00045).
Deptford Mall Fight 2020,
How To Get A Libra Man To Stop Ignoring You,
Independence High School Bell Schedule,
Highlights Hidden Pictures Daily Challenge,
Eris Conjunct North Node Synastry,
Articles F
