Be very careful in looking a social media in hiring, because you might unintentionally learn things that should not be taken into account in hiring, and that could be risky for the entity. Usually when I hear people doing research on how to talk to managers, they are asking about that managers preference (When Jane asks for a solution recommendation, is she looking for statistics or should I keep it high level? not Can Jane understand X technology or must I explain the details to her?). Found out she actually has less experience than me (both in the industry and in general), and based on my experience working with her so far, shes not particularly smarter or more knowledgeable or more anything than me. And deliberately trying to learn that stuff is creepy, but way worse if I talk to them about it. Ive been the target of bad googling. On the other hand, outside of legitimate background checks, deep digging is pretty much waaaay over the line. The fault falls squarely on the shoulders of the person doing the snooping. And I couldnt help thinking that my manager doesnt understand what I do was a bit of a strange complaint. The amount of rigid, all-or-nothing thinking in this comment section is frustrating (not the person Im responding to specifically, but in general). I do get creeped out when I see someone liked one of them from five years ago. Think of the Chipotle manager that was accused of racism. Anybody who thought they were in a private corner of cyberia was being nave. The information is public. Privacy Policy and Affiliate Disclosures, my new employee ran a background check on me and asked me about what he found, I'm a nepotism baby, paying based on where employees live, and more. Of all the swag Ive ever gotten, I only actually like/use two items- an unexpectedly nice pen and a sturdy plastic cup. My coworker is one of those people who always googles new hires and he used to tell me stuff and I was like, Im good, dont tell me stuff. Verified answer. 2021530 . greyclovds 7 mo. Checking out career paths and history is very helpful, to be sure. I feel like your person social media being a part of your work is more rare than not. People keep using that comparison and I must respectfully disagree. NOT because its ok to do these deep dives. However, if I lug home 27 pieces of swag (pens, tiny foam mascot) from the trade show I spent 10 hour days at, Id be irritated if HR had to approve my keeping it. Yes, its reality, but we shouldnt accept it. Or the arrest record of the LW from the other day. Still, at a minimum, I feel like I deserve her title (it could really jumpstart my career), if not her pay. Its another thing to take a look at things they purposefully make public about themselves on a popular social media site. Its hard to find a default (except maybe amazon), so I think Starbucks isnt a bad call. (Googling personal data for legitimate hiring purposes obviously falls under a different umbrella.). Fun story of when snooping can actually go right: after I departed my last job, the person who replaced me had never done that type of work and was really struggling. It would be a bigger deal if the department had a big event with gifts. I Googled myself yesterday and here are a few things Ive found that I never posted: 5K race times from the past few years, opinion articles I wrote for my college newspaper (this was the early 2000s and the paper didnt have a strong online presence), a pic that someone uploaded to my colleges digital depository that Im not in, but someone thought I was in, a few of my cross country times from high school, results of softball games from the mid-90s, etc. Young techno-whizzes preached the advantage of splashing yourself all over the web so anyone could find you. We should push, like people in Europe have, to change that. In my scenario its that moment where you go Im going to see what else they may have under this alias that youve crossed that line. Its more accurate than third party. Nah, these are presentations being given on your lunch time, so its fine for you to take that stuff home if you want to. For reference, I work for a large equipment manufacturer. Sometimes theyll ask you to provide a W2, but thats not to check how much you made; its because the company didnt respond to the employment verification request. Thisis trueand yet I hesitate because internalized bias means some people feel less-safe based on protected characteristics. I think it depends on what level the manager doesnt understand. I am not pro-tell everyone everything in fact I am quite the opposite, I am an I dont post anything online that I dont want the whole world to see person. It is clearly not to my advantage for her to be giving out my former salary. how do I avoid mom energy with my younger employees? But when I do post I imagine that anyone and everyone is going to see it. Im so sorry you experienced a newsworthy family tragedy. Alison answered this before, as WellRed mentioned, and there was an update. But if you want to know anything about a colleague, you ASK them about it. My point is people are going to do it. I am constantly receiving Starbucks giftcards that are of no use to me, since I dont drink coffee or tea. He sounded interesting! Yes. is it time to put my employee on a formal improvement plan? There is conversation happening all around you all the time that you could possibly pay attention to, but its not FOR you, and thats the difference. And, sure, I could just ask instead of googling, but Im pretty socially awkward and I think I would just come across as weirdly interrogating someone if I tried that. Maybe the reason it feels like you are questioning their ability is because you kinda are. Limited information is OK i.e. I know the idea If you dont want people to know how much you pay for a house, dont buy a house. sounds harsh, but that is the reality we live in. Okay, but why, though? Agreed. You cannot use social media and search engines, and then complain that other people use social media and search engines too. If it can be found during a garden-variety google search, thats technology for you. Now if I want to have privacy and dance around in a cow costume then I shut the blinds so no one can see. That makes sense to do. Ive looked up colleagues on LinkedIn, but thats what that platform is for. But its creepy. One time my manager basically implied that he thought I was lying about the business need for a process to go one way just to prove another colleague wrong. If you find your company accountant had previously been tried for fraud at his last two companies, then oh yeah, thats worthwhile information. colleagues should never snoop or look up information cvs kasm 29, 2021 '' te g&246;nderildi tarafndan they&226; ve written him of so many times, but he&226; s always come back. I said, Yes. When his face fell, I said, But it wasnt mine to tell.. You may confuse the information with your co-worker, when it could be someone else. BUT, I dont think people necessarily have a right to be upset if others find things about you that you posted online, because its never 100% private. He wasnt fired solely on the basis of it, though, he was fired because he was inappropriate with at least one coworker and was making racist (and otherwise biased) remarks. Otherwise it clogs your junk drawer and is ultimately useless. (Select all that apply) A colleague shares the name of the medication another colleague is taking. Yeah, I don't Google but I look up bosses, colleagues, and prospective employers on LinkedIn regularly. @Autumnheart but youre assuming that all the info someone finds by googling someone else is something that person explicitly posted online. Letter #1: Heres a golden rule: Does it have a purpose that I would feel okay saying to the person and/or my boss? It is information collected specifically for the purpose of informing the public. But if you do, and you find something incriminating,. (And yes, Ive tried several times to point out the problem with this, but was unsuccessful.). When the main office has pizza, the manager has tried (1) having pizza delivered to us here, (2) offering us a budget to plan a lunch of our own, (3) sending us gift cards, (4) giving one of us money to bring in donuts for the rest, (5) sending us to see a movie on work time (there was a vague connection between the movie and our company, but it was a real movie and not a training film). For me, the difference is the amount of effort taken. I wouldve left her to it. PVR I so agree with you. Some people have some sensitive things out there which they cant take down. Of course, that but again thats more about what someone does with the information once they find it as opposed to whether they googled it in the first place. That is utterly absurd. You can do it, but you shouldnt really. The delivery guy called and said, Im at 123 Main Street, and theres nothing here but a bank, and the boss said, No, 123 Main Street should be the Springfield Building, and the delivery guy said, Im not in Springfield, Im in Spring Green.), what about a $10 prepaid visa card periodically? Most importantly, remain silent until they're . Its very similar to digging for their high school livejournal, in fact. I often get a Dragon Drink, which I dont think has any caffeine in it, if thats what youre avoiding. Our workgroup sometimes spends their whole shift in company vehicles. Then the management devolved to the head of the law library, who seemed to see our project as some sort of attack on his authority. I ended up coming into work late one day so I could drop everything and tour this house and put in an offer the very day it went on the market, so everyone at work knew more about my home-buying process than usual. By participating in certain aspects/actions that society has deemed a public interest we give implicit consent to it being made public. I look at their social media, I look up their name to see what comes up on their professional background, I read their twitter feeds, I look at their Instagram and YouTube. I finally understand why companies give away branded pens. I agree. If your coworkers are snooping into your professional or personal life, take action to stop the bad behavior. Because going to the house of someone you barely know when theyve never invited you there is creepy. Also a huge factor with companies that work with or for government agencies in other ways; I work for a company that competes for projects large and small with private companies and government agencies at all levels, and we have extremely strict rules against receiving (or giving) anything of value not only to current or potential clients, but also current or potential subcontractors, or current or potential suppliers and/or vendors. Your colleague is either someone who works directly with you in the same organization or someone who's not in your organization but has similar roles and skills. Or maybe Ill go to a tradeshow, collect all the swag I can get my hands on, and submit individual disclosures on each item. One time we were having a cupcake party to celebrate the completion of a huge multi-year project that he had played a significant role in (and had been hired for the project). She worked at a nonprofit and her boss felt she should donate it to the cause. Now they are running a new background check A fine use of taxpayer dollars. Im not embarrassed to be seen reading a book, but I would be alarmed to look up and find that I was being watched by someone who happened to be able to see in my window, and wonder what nefarious purpose they had for watching me. if you bought a house, how much you paid for it. Focus on what the director cares about and throw out everything else in the conversation and just talk about that. Even in the early days of the internet, it was the Worldwide Web. That sounds perfectly legitimate to me, and I dont think the OP will help themselves by assuming bad faith. I know it made the remote staff feel left out and unappreciated. That doesnt mean Id be happy if you called me up. There was one time where my personal twitter (that I honestly forgot I had, I never used it) got hacked and for about a week was doing nothing but streaming porn links. You have the right to disagree with it or even find it creepy. Instead, do it late in the hiring process, in a similar way you do reference checks, to check for egregious behavior that you would consciously use to pull an offer. But you are kind of giving a blanket I can look at anything personal statment. Ive Googled people. Unfortunately, I hadnt told her that the job was at a higher level than when I was employed with her. . ) I have looked at LinkedIn profiles of some co-workers and people who are interviewing me for jobs. I googled herusing first, middle, and last name, all of which were fairly unique. In the case of the LW whose coworker actually confronted her with information and expected her to explain herselfthat was super over the line. If you do a google search on a coworker and see the things theyve created intentionally for the wider public to see, like their LinkedIn or a public Twitter or Facebook profile. Even if you have five pizza parties and only send out one card, at least youre admitting the home gang exists. I am an early adopter, and have pretty much been on every social media platform. Why is it different? HIPAA is an acronym for Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. An update automatically sending connections for me to everyone everywhere with the slightest, most tenuous connection how many times removed, is a whole different thing and its not just creepy. And lots of things are on the internet with no input from use.g. If you dont want to be found live off the grid is what it comes down to. My old manager told a reference checker what my salary was. So even though my gut instinct to the title is boy is that weird its what I do if the thing Im curious about is in the arts. #3. Checking on me online is a minefield. What if *you* didnt put it up? If you see two people at the grocery store who are clearly having an intense whispered conversation, yeah. Thats not necessarily true. Because I didnt consent to have any of that information available. Stop accepting a bad reality as just the way things are denounce it and dont participate in it. Instead, I went to HR and said I would love to earn a You are Fantastic and here is why Evaluation from my manager, but have received a Thanks so much, all is good Evaluation 2 years running. Should people be aware when they post things online that literally anybody can see at any moment? I think its kind of like gossip. What I post under my name on social media is there to be looked at and create an image. I can see it in the arts, because if you google an artist, you might find neat examples of their work and stuff. I would never share that kind of personal information with coworkers, but its archived on easily accessible news sites that I have no control over and I know it colors others perceptions of me. Staring at someone at a restaurant for your entire meal is creepy. So I would let it go for now, but then the next time youre going to use her as a reference, give her a heads up that she may be getting a call and also let her know that youre keeping your former salary confidential. I had an experience related to the manager not knowing what I do One department hired me, but didnt have the budget for me so they technically put me in a different department and technically had to have me report to that departments head even though I was really working for a different department. But people will really appreciate you occasionally doing something for them as well. I know I can find deep stuff about people online that is not easy to find, but frankly in general thats not right. She never bought a pen or a thing of hand sanitiser or even a coffee mug, nowadays, she never really gets anything at all. As someone in academia, I Google a lot of professional contacts before I reach out to them- both because most people dont have very complete LinkedIn pages, and because I can learn a lot about their current projects in our field that way! Social media is not privacy. You said the OP is looking for plausible deniability because they want to snoop on coworkers. It used to be that you had to write to the courthouse to get the information. Not only is that shady, its outright idiotic. And the question of whether its too nosy is irrelevant to the point of absurdity. where employees are expected to have fairly active online presences. It changes from odd to creepy, the minute they let you know they are surveilling you for no particular reason (like they are letting you know they found garden variety stuff instead of something like a hate speech manifesto against your client base). I mean, I liked that time I got a free meal from my employer when I was remote, but even then, the entire team was remote. Fine? I have no interest in the personal (or previously professional) lives of my managers, higher management or co-workers. 5. But since I dont have one large office to put everyone in, even my on-campus staff are spread out in several locations. A lot of the time, people send their employees to training as a substitute for effectively managing performance. They have. The fact that you didnt fully and truly understand the ramifications of the reach of your audience has no bearing on any of this. So if I want to do a crazy dance in a cow costume in my bedroom with the blinds open I imagine that someone is looking and maybe even recording me. Exactly. Weve had almost 100% turnover in HR since this last time I pushed to get this policy changed. I get that googling a coworker is odd to you but I think equating it with driving by their house is not reasonable. Unfortunately, there are some shady companies who think its ok to lowball you because youre out of work. Judging by the comments here, Im right that many people will in fact find it creepy if you go too far digging into public information. I was curious who I was going to be working with. I tried deflecting, but it hasnt worked. So they worked (and billed for services) for *months* under a revoked license, until an entry-level staff member snooped and uncovered the truth. If youre uncomfortable with what the law decides is public information, thats on you. I agree. Honestly? But idle curiosity leads to bad knowledge youd rather not have. Colleagues should never snoop or look up information cvs First off, many people put things up in the old days before mega search engines. Youre making yourself willfully ignorant by not acknowledging that its wrong to do this and then judge people based on something private they didnt necessarily want to share, but its out there anyway. The bottom line is that its on the individual to control what they publish. Paid background checks on your coworkers are way past the line. Right now Im honestly just hoping that my new boss wont last long at this job. I agree that telling you about their findings is a major part of the obnoxiousness around this kind of thing. LW 2: salary negotiation classes? And hes very likely to scare anybody prone to being nervous. It doesnt take much time at all to see on LinkedIn that someone has linked a professional blog under BlogName79 dot blogsite dot com, think hm, what else have they published under BlogName79? and pop that into Google and now youre reading their LiveJournal from 2002 and laughing at their MySpace top 8 choices. While the company has a strong record for these bonuses, I dont believe my base pay should be less than what I would earn elsewhere. My bosses have always been cool with me keeping or redistributing as I see fit. If you accidentally comment about someones college trip to Bali that they posted about on Facebook 5 years ago, and if they know they never mentioned that trip to you, they will be seriously creeped out, and it will be mighty awkward working with them. Its a standard part of my interview prep. Both systems pick up the authentication information they need from the DNS (domain name service), the service they already use to look up IP addresses. I dont care too much about what my colleagues are up to outside the office. This is my hill! In general, I think its very bad to look up applicants early in the process. Every few months well go get a pizza together just so we can get our preferred toppings. But it absolutely feels like an invasion of my privacy. You are also missing something extremely important context. That information could have been used against her in numerous ways. I mean if they were giving off serious serial killer vibes and I had to work alone with them, that would be one thing, but otherwise, no. Yes. Wrong answer. A lot of my high school accomplishments were featured in the local paper which now has all its archives online. At this point our remote staff are some of our longest tenured employees (they are employees who were hired when we had actual satellite offices in other states one of them has been with this org for over two decades) so the senior staff does try to find opportunities to make them feel included in main office recognition/fun when feasible. Thats similar to my (and many peoples) response to the previous snooping letter, and I think it works for a lot of such situations. Our govies wont even eat the free popcorn in our office. Having the wrong opinions about the wrong coworker might result in rather significant harassment and abuse. And theyve just pulled something like this again. a colleague shares the name of the medication, a colleague decides to send an invitation. I did the exact same thing with an ex-boyfriends username from an online dating app. By Posted halston hills housing co operative In anson county concealed carry permit renewal So I am able to take care of everyone on campus. She likely thought she was helping, but she really overstepped. Its something that used to be very common but is now less-so. The best policy is to keep your mouth shut. Do these people live in town? We have multiple locations, so a quick Linkedin search tells me their background and indicates their base is likely at one of the locations I am never going to visit sets my expectations that most of our interactions are not going to be in person. But for me, a line gets crossed when you start seeking out information that was not intended for the wider public, but for a more limited segment of the public. Crossing over into peoples 15 year old MySpace profile that hasnt been updated in forever to figure out what they were like in college is creepy. Like, who has the same email they had in the 1980s? If youre trying to find out everything about their life, thats over the line. Because Im a pragmatist when it comes to things like safety, and as my husbands driving instructor said about defensive driving If you wind up in the hospital, its not going to matter if you were right or not. It doesnt make it ok to run red lights, or to assault someone because its a dark nigh etc. Itll have pics of the inside from the most recent sale, and how much it cost. I was trained as a police dispatcher and it was a criminal offense to snoop into peoples files without a specific purpose. We started around the same time. Its part of your job to give them enough information to make the decisions you need them to or if everything is going swimmingly and you dont need support to make sure you agree with them on metrics for success so you can show the manager/director theyre being met. on their website which can then be drawn into other searches. I mean, anyone could make a blog post and say whatever, but the accusations were pretty shocking and I cant imagine being comfortable moving forward with a candidate after that. Even if you were genuinely curious about those things. Exactly this with the minor exception of having the manager/director actually pick and communicate to you even a single metric for success I feel for your difficult experience. @Librarian of SHIELD, I very much agree about the line, and how nebulous it is. It may be shorter wait to go inside. A lot of people leave their jobs because theyre being underpaid it doesnt make sense for employers to base their pay on that information. Its like them taking an ad out in the New York Times and then wondering how people know whats in the ad. If you dont understand what youre agreeing to, hire a lawyer to explain it to you. colleagues should never snoop or look up information cvs Too much stuff! I mean if I were in the arts, Id probably google people. To Malarkey01, I for sure did not go to HR and say what I said here agreed that would not be productive. However if I have to pay to get something or have to use sneaky alternatives to look (private Facebook, records search) then it is out of bounds. Probably in much more detail than you really care aboutLOL. TRUE FALSE 7) Colleague responsibilities related to compliance include which of the following: Report if you have been placed on a state or federal exclusion list Report if you have been convicted of a minor traffic violation Report when your employment-related professional licenses have been renewed Report when you complete annual continuing One can hardly post details of their personal life online and then claim that anyone who sees it is pre-judging or not getting to know them. And if you find something like you find, theres still time to act. And at that time it would be hard to let unconscious bias against, say, someone with an unseen disability or pregnancy status, derail the hiring at that point. (It was generous; where we lived at the time in a LCOL city we had to try hard to spend it all :) ) I though that was a good balance! Housemate isnt a professional relationship. Not continuously (like, I'm not going to be looking you up on LinkedIn when we've worked together for a while), but at the start, absolutely. Theyre good on a hot pizza and extra good on the cold leftover pizza the next day, like a salty little umami bomb. You actively chose to do it every single time you posted. That was the case in 1994 and its the case in 2019. Of course roles have budgets, salary ranges, etc. Maybe its not the right or nice thing to do, but, well, the internet is there, human curiosity knows no bounds, and rabbit-holing is a thing. I want to see what their backgrounds are : which universities and which companies. My boss regularly comments on my lawn/yard, but, to be fair, I live a few blocks from where I work and am on a reasonable route for her to be driving past my house every day, and she learned about my houses location during all of the house-buying drama I went through to get a house in an Extreme Sellers Market a couple years back. An accurate but cultivated one. Colleagues should never snoop or look up information cvs Information on _______ features is not the only thing that scientists get from EOS data. It makes me so sad, though, because I SO LOVE managing my team, working with the clients we have served, and making the awesome products we have made. Copyright 2007 - 2023 Ask A Manager. They will. If I went on a date with someone and thought it might go somewhere, for example. Ill have to try that. Do not assume that your level of digital literacy and safety is the same as others. One personal example are the cringeworthy articles I wrote for my college newspaper. Save your money, read AAM. Dont beat yourself up about this. Workplace Privacy Between Coworkers - AllBusiness.com Yes its all available and no, I guess people shouldnt be surprised that it can happen but theyre more than in the right to feel violated that it did. If they dont, then getting suggestions on what perks theyd enjoy is a good idea.
Northeastern Club Rowing,
Sanyo Tv Screen Goes Black After A Few Seconds,
Primal To Dual Conversion,
Which Area Is Not Protected By Most Homeowners Insurance?,
Outer Banks Arrests,
Articles C
